AI-assisted daily publishing
StampSnap's scheduled workflow can prepare up to three original collector guides per UTC day. A generative AI model receives a defined topic, existing-topic context, and excerpts fetched from a curated source set. It is instructed to use only those supplied excerpts for factual claims and to avoid unsupported prices, catalog numbers, rarity claims, accuracy claims, and endorsements.
The model assists with drafting; it is not treated as an authority or source. Every published article identifies StampSnap Editorial as the authoring organization and displays the external references used for its general guidance.
Automated publication checks
Before an automated draft can be written to the site, it must satisfy a structured content contract, minimum article length, approved-source rules, unique publication-slot rules, duplicate topic and slug checks, and prohibited-claim checks. The site workflow also validates the content collection and runs tests and a production build before committing new articles.
These safeguards reduce predictable errors, but they do not make automated text infallible and they are not a substitute for expert examination of a physical stamp.
Where human review applies
Not every automatically generated article is manually reviewed before publication. A person may directly write or maintain foundational content, investigate a reported problem, compare the passage with reliable references, correct or remove material, and improve the automated guardrails when a recurring issue is found.
Article bylines therefore link to this policy instead of claiming that every sentence received pre-publication human review. When a consequential identification, authenticity, value, insurance, estate, purchase, or sale decision is involved, readers should consult an appropriate catalog and a qualified philatelic professional.
Sources and independence
The source library favors established museums, postal institutions, philatelic organizations, and specialist educational references. Source links appear on the article so readers can inspect them directly. A link is not an endorsement of StampSnap, and the source does not verify a particular app result.
Sources support the general guidance in an article. Details that distinguish a specific issue may depend on paper, watermark, gum, perforation, repairs, provenance, or other physical evidence that a website or photograph cannot confirm.
Corrections and material updates
Send correction requests to support@stampsnap.app with the article URL, the exact passage, the reason it may be wrong, and a supporting reference where possible. We review actionable reports and may correct, clarify, update, or remove content.
When an article receives a material content change, its visible updated date and structured dateModified value should reflect that revision. Minor formatting changes may not result in an editorial note.